An analysis motivated by the question of the amount of reservation of Queensland coal seam gas production needed to preserve domestic supply
(a work in progress)
Developing the Queensland CSG fields at scale was always going to risk that production would fall short of targets. As much was acknowledged by the joint Department of Industry and Bureau of Resources and Energy Economics study into Eastern Australian gas markets
The current development of LNG in eastern Australia and the expected tripling of gas demand are creating conditions that are in stark contrast to those in the previously isolated domestic gas market. The timely development of gas resources will be important to ensure that supply is available for domestic gas users and to meet LNG export commitments. Such is the scale of the LNG projects that even small deviations from the CSG reserve development schedule could result in significant volumes of gas being sourced from traditional domestic market supplies
And so it was, as I have written elsewhere.
The implication for the electricity markets has been profound, contributing directly to a doubling in wholesale market prices across 2016, amounting to a nominal increase in market value of some $14 billion over the year or ~$580 for every Australian.
In a word, the opening of the LNG export market meant domestic supply fell by ~12%, from about 1750 TJ/day in 2014 to 1540 TJ/day from 2016 on, and has not substantially recovered.
Figure 1: Annual average daily supply to the domestic market neglecting NSW production, 2010-2019
That represents a profound change in domestic supply driven in large part by a dramatic increase in domestic gas prices. That has flowed through associated sectors of the economy including the electricity market, pretty much as feared by the Department of Industry and Bureau of Resources and Energy Economics back in 2013 as cited above.
The question that motivates the analysis here is
what amount of reservation of Queensland CSG (coal seam) gas production would have been needed to preserve domestic supply at pre-2015 levels? (i.e., prior to opening of the LNG export facility at Curtis Island in Gladstone).
The short answer is about 7% of the total gas that now flows to the Curtis Island Demand Zone at Gladstone destined for export or for use in the processing of that exported gas.
Data used in this analysis is sourced from AEMO and the Gladstone Port Authority (GPA).
Note that NSW is neglected here since the contribution to east coast gas supply is only in the order of one percent.
The key feature of the east coast market dynamic is the increase in production from an average of around 1760 TJ/day prior to 2015 to ~5000 TJ/day from 2017 on. All the new gas is due to increased production in the Queensland CSG fields.
Figure 2: East coast gas market daily production data aggregated by the main producing states.
In the figure above
Because the GPA exports are reported by month and are “quantised” by cargo departures on a >1 day cycle, monthly averages shown here are approximated by applying a smoothing filter on reported monthly values (namely 1/6*previous.month + 2/3*current.month + 1/6*subsequent.month).
Also note that the CIDZ deliveries are not aggregated in the AEMO data prior to November 2015. For the period January 2015 to October 2015, I approximate this as the smoothed export volume multplied by the ratio 1.155. This ratio, which represents the average of the CIDZ delivery to LNG exports for the period post October 2015, is the loading factor associated with LNG processing.
Note-
The changes in gas production are reflected in percentage contubutions, with QLD increasing from ~20% in the winter of 2010 to more than ~75% of gas production in the winter of 2019. Summer contributions of QLD production are typicallly 5-10% higher reflecting the larger industrial demand proportion relative to southern states(see below).
Figure 3: East coast gas market daily production data aggregated by the main producing states as percenatge of the total.
Subtracting the Curtis Island demand from QLD production gives the balance supplied into the domestic market.
Note-
Figure 4: East coast gas market daily production data balance to local supply (+ve) and expert (-ve) aggregated by the main producing states.
Domestic demand shows a stong seasonal variation due to the historical use of gas for winter heating in the southern states, with peak production historically at slightly aove 2000 TJ/day.
Note
Figure 5: Supply to the non-LNG domestic market (i.e. less the gas supplied to the Curtis Isand Demand Zone destined for export).
The proportional contributions of supply to the domestic market highlight marked declne from Queensland.
Figure 6: Supply to the non-LNG domestic market (i.e. less the gas supplied to the Curtis Isand Demand Zone destined for export) as perecnatge of total.
The total contributions with 8% reservation of exported gas including processing loads.
Figure 7: Projected supply to the non-LNG domestic market with an 8% reservation of the Curtis Isand Demand Zone gas.
The proportional contributions with 8% reservation of exported gas including processing loads.
Figure 8: Projected supply to the non-LNG domestic market with an 8% reservation of the Curtis Isand Demand Zone gas as the percentage of total.
The resultant annual supply balance expressed in terms of percentage of reservation of exported gas including processing loads.
Figure 9: Projected average daily east coast gas market domestic supply with reservation levels 0%, 4%, 8% & 12%.